کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1773940 | 1021152 | 2011 | 17 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Large impacts detected by the Apollo seismometers: Impactor mass and source cutoff frequency estimations Large impacts detected by the Apollo seismometers: Impactor mass and source cutoff frequency estimations](/preview/png/1773940.png)
Meteoroid impacts are important seismic sources on the Moon. As they continuously impact the Moon, they are a significant contribution to the lunar micro-seismic background noise. They also were associated with the most powerful seismic sources recorded by the Apollo seismic network. We study in this paper the largest impacts. We show that their masses can be estimated with a rather simple modeling technique and that high frequency seismic signals have reduced amplitudes due to a relatively low (about 1 s) corner frequency resulting from the duration of the impact process and the crater formation. If synthetic seismograms computed for a spherical model of the Moon are unable to match the waveforms of the observations, they nevertheless provide an approximate measure of the energy of seismic waves in the coda. The latter can then be used for an estimation of the mass of the impactors, when the velocity of the impactor is known. This method, for the artificial impacts of the LM and SIVB Apollo upper stages, allows us to retrieve the mass within 20% of relative error. The estimated mass of the largest impacts observed during the 7 years of activity of the Apollo seismic network provides an explanation for the non-detection of surface waves on the seismograms. The specifications of future Moon seismometers, in order to provide the detection of surface waves, are given in conclusion.
Research highlights
► We propose a model for the seismic source associated with an impact (accounting ejecta material).
► Relatively low (about 1 s) corner frequency results from the duration of the impact process.
► The estimated mass of the impacts provides an explanation for the non-detection of surface waves on the Apollo seismograms.
► Future seismometers must have performances at least 10 times better than Apollo in order to get these surface waves from comparable impacts.
Journal: Icarus - Volume 211, Issue 2, February 2011, Pages 1049–1065