Field-aligned currents onboard the Intercosmos Bulgaria-1300 satellite in comparison with modeled FAC

The statistical field-aligned current (FAC) distribution has been demonstrated by [Iijima, T., Potemra, T.A., 1976. The amplitude distribution of field-aligned currents at northern high latitudes observed by Triad. Journal of Geophysical Research 81(13), 2165-2174] and many other authors. The large-scale (LS) FACs have been described by different empirical/statistical models [Feldstein, Ya. I., Levitin, A.E., 1986. Solar wind control of electric fields and currents in the ionosphere. Journal of Geomagnetism and Geoelectricity 38, 1143; Papitashvili, V.O., Rich, F.J., Heinemann, M.A., Hairston, M.R., 1999. Parameterization of the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program ionospheric electrostatic potentials by the interplanetary magnetic field strength and direction. Journal of Geophysical Research 104, 177-184; Papitashvili, V.O., Christiansen, F., Neubert, T., 2002. A new model of field-aligned currents derived from high-precision satellite magnetic field data. Geophysical Research Letters, 29(14), 1683, doi:10.1029/2001GL014207; Tsyganenko, N.A., 2001. A model of the near magnetosphere with a dawn-dusk asymetry (I. Mathematical structure). Journal of Geophysical Research 107(A8), doi:10.1029/2001JA000219; Weimer, D.R., 1996a. A new model for prediction of ionospheric electric potentials as a function of the IMF. In: Snowmass'96 Online Poster Session; Weimer, D.R., 1996b. Substorm influence on the ionospheric convection patterns. In: Snowmass'96 Online Poster Session; Weimer, D.R., 2001. Maps of ionospheric field-aligned currents as a function of the interplanetary magnetic field derived from Dynamic Explorer 2 data. Journal of Geophysical Research 106, 12,889-12,902; Weimer, D.R., 2005. Improved ionospheric electrodynamic models and application to calculating Joule heating rates. Journal of Geophysical Research 110, A05306, doi:10.1029/2004JA010884]. In the present work, we compare two cases of LS FAC obtained from magnetic field measurements onboard the Intercosmos Bulgaria-1300 satellite with three models: two empirical [Tsyganenko, N.A., 2001. A model of the near magnetosphere with a down-dusk asymetry (I. Mathematical structure). Journal of Geophysical Research 107(A8), doi:10.1029/2001JA000219; Weimer, D.R., 2005. Improved ionospheric electrodynamic models and application to calculating Joule heating rates. Journal of Geophysical Research 110, A05306, doi:10.1029/2004JA010884] and one computer-based MHD-simulation in “The Community Coordinated Modeling Center” (CCMC) [Toth, G., et al., 2005. Space weather modeling framework: a new tool for the space science community. Journal of Geophysical Research 110, A12226, doi:10.1029/2005JA011126]. We found that the position of the measured FAC is close to the positions predicted by the models, but the measured density can be greater than the model FAC densities. We discuss the possible reasons for the observed discrepancy between the measured and modeled FACs.