کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
1791776 1023620 2012 4 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
A comparison of the effect of Ca2+ codoping in cerium doped GSO with that of LSO and YSO
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه فیزیک و نجوم فیزیک ماده چگال
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
A comparison of the effect of Ca2+ codoping in cerium doped GSO with that of LSO and YSO
چکیده انگلیسی

The cerium-doped oxyorthosilicates Lu2SiO5 (LSO), Y2SiO5 (YSO), and Gd2SiO5 (GSO) are well-known single-crystal scintillators with well-characterized properties, which are commonly used for gamma-ray detection. LSO and YSO share the monoclinic C2/c structure in which the two rare earth sites, which are also the cerium substitutional sites, have coordination numbers 6 and 7. GSO differs in that it has a monoclinic P21/c structure, in which the two rare earth sites have coordination numbers 7 and 9. Prior work has shown that cerium doped LSO and YSO can be very successfully codoped with Ca2+, increasing the light yield and shortening the decay time in a reproducible, predictable way. It is known that this aliovalent codoping results in a significant reduction in shallow charge carrier traps in both YSO and LSO without any significant changes in the emission and excitation spectra. This current work extends that prior investigation; in this case, the scintillation properties of cerium doped GSO single crystals, with and without Ca2+ codoping, are compared with those of LSO and YSO single crystals.


► Ca2+ codoping is known to improve scintillation properties in LSO and YSO.
► This work compares the effect of Ca2+ codoping in GSO to that of LSO and YSO.
► In all three materials codoping reduces presence of charge carrier traps.
► In all three materials the codoped samples have faster decay time.
► GSO differs from LSO and YSO in that the codoped samples have diminished light yield.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Crystal Growth - Volume 352, Issue 1, 1 August 2012, Pages 133–136
نویسندگان
, , , ,