کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
1880323 1043010 2014 9 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
A new pencil beam model for photon dose calculations in heterogeneous media
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
مدل پرتو مداد جدید برای محاسبه دوز فوتون در رسانه های ناهمگن
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه فیزیک و نجوم تشعشع
چکیده انگلیسی


• A new pencil beam model for photon dose calculations in heterogeneous media.
• Improved the accuracy of the superposition method.
• Speeded up dose calculations with FFTC.

The pencil beam method is commonly used for dose calculations in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). In this study, we have proposed a novel pencil model for calculating photon dose distributions in heterogeneous media. To avoid any oblique kernel-related bias and reduce computation time, dose distributions were computed in a spherical coordinate system based on the pencil kernels of different distances from source to surface (DSS). We employed two different dose calculation methods: the superposition method and the fast Fourier transform convolution (FFTC) method. In order to render the superposition method more accurate, we scaled the depth-directed component by moving the position of the entry point and altering the DSS value for a given beamlet. The lateral components were thus directly corrected by the density scaling method along the spherical shell without taking the densities from the previous layers into account. Significant computation time could be saved by performing the FFTC calculations on each spherical shell, disregarding density changes in the lateral direction. The proposed methods were tested on several phantoms, including lung- and bone-type heterogeneities. We compared them with Monte Carlo (MC) simulation for several field sizes with 6 MV photon beams. Our results revealed mean absolute deviations <1% for the proposed superposition method. Compared to the AAA algorithm, this method improved dose calculation accuracy by at least 0.3% in heterogeneous phantoms. The FFTC method was approximately 40 times faster than the superposition method. However, compared with MC, mean absolute deviations were <3% for the FFTC method.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Physica Medica - Volume 30, Issue 7, November 2014, Pages 765–773
نویسندگان
, , , , , , ,