کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
1882334 1043219 2015 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Assessment and clinical validation of margins for adaptive simultaneous integrated boost in neo-adjuvant radiochemotherapy for rectal cancer
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
ارزیابی و اعتبار بالینی حاشیه برای تقویت یکپارچه همزمان یکپارچه در رادیوتراپی رادیواکتیو نئو آدیووان برای سرطان رکتوم
کلمات کلیدی
سرطان رکتوم حاشیه، رادیوتراپی سازگار، تاموتراپی
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه فیزیک و نجوم تشعشع
چکیده انگلیسی


• Rectal motion during adaptive concomitant boost (ACB) for rectal cancer is an issue.
• Based on daily MVCT data of 10 pts, margins for rectum deformation were assessed.
• Smaller margins were assessed in the 2nd half of treatment (when ACB is delivered).
• Margins for ACB (5–7 mm) were successfully validated on 20 new patients.
• Female patients show a slightly larger residual (deformation) error than males.

PurposeAn adaptive concomitant boost (ACB) for the neo-adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer was clinically implemented. In this study population margins M(90,90) considering rectal deformation were derived for 10 consecutive patients treated at 18 × 2.3 Gy with Helical Tomotherapy (HT) and prospectively validated on 20 additional patients treated with HT, delivering ACB in the last 6 fractions.MethodsSectorial margins M(90,90) of the whole and second treatment parts were assessed for 90% population through a method combining the 90% coverage probability maps of rectal positions (CPC90%) with 3D local distance measurements between the CPC90% and a reference rectal contour. M(90,90) were compared with the margins M(90,90)95%/99%, ensuring CPC90% coverage with 95%/99% confidence level. M(90,90) of the treatment second part were chosen as ACB margins which were clinically validated for each patient by means of %volume missing of CPC5/6 excluded by the ACB margins.ResultsThe whole treatment M(90,90) ranged between 1.9 mm and 9 mm in the lower-posterior and upper-anterior sectors, respectively. Regarding ACB, M(90,90) were 7 mm in the anterior direction and <5 mm elsewhere. M(90,90)95%/99% did not significantly differ from M(90,90). The %volume excluded by the ACB margin was<2% for all male and <5% for 9/10 female patients. The dosimetry impact on R_adapt for the patients with the largest residual error was negligible.ConclusionsLocal deformation measurements confirm an anisotropic motion of rectum once set-up error is rigidly corrected. Margins of 7 mm anterior and 5 mm elsewhere are adequate for ACB. Female patients show a slightly larger residual error.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Physica Medica - Volume 31, Issue 2, March 2015, Pages 167–172
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , , , , ,