کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1931053 | 1050540 | 2010 | 6 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Trafficking of amyloid β-precursor protein products C83 and C99 on the endocytic pathway Trafficking of amyloid β-precursor protein products C83 and C99 on the endocytic pathway](/preview/png/1931053.png)
Amyloid β-precursor protein (APP) proteolytic products C83 and C99 are substrates for γ-secretase as well as products, respectively, of α- or β-secretase. In contrast to APP, C83 and C99 were derivatized by a water soluble biotinylation reagent to a much greater extent at 18 °C than at 0 °C in CHO cells expressing the Swedish mutant form of APP750. Intracellular C99 and C83 cycle to the cell surface when maintained in buffered saline at 18 °C thus identifying proteins derivatized at 18 °C as residing in recycling compartments. More than 80% of C99 and C83 biotinylated at 18 °C is associated with detergent resistant membrane (DRM). There thus appears to be no differential distribution of α- or β-secretase products into the DRM fraction that would be expected if localization to DRM determines alternative secretase pathways. γ-Secretase inhibitors increased the fraction of C99 but not C83 in the 18 °C pool by >50% and doubled the half-life of C99 in that compartment, showing that a substantial amount of C99 is proteolyzed by γ-secretase in a compartment rich in recycling proteins. The temporal appearance of APP on the cell surface preceded that of C99 in the recycling compartment, further supporting the cleavage of APP in recycling endosomes.
Research highlights
► The protease inhibitor MG132 increases C83 on the secretory pathway with reduced cell surface APP.
► γ-secretase inhibitors affect the turnover and accumulation of C99 in a recycling compartment.
► C83 and C99 occur predominately in detergent resistant membranes of the recycling compartment.
► The latter data refutes a proposal that DRM localization determines γ- or α-secretase cleavages.
Journal: Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications - Volume 401, Issue 2, 15 October 2010, Pages 219–224