کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1931341 | 1536787 | 2010 | 7 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

The aggregation of chondroprogenitor mesenchymal cells into precartilage condensation represents one of the earliest events in chondrogenesis. N-cadherin is a key cell adhesion molecule implicated in chondrogenic differentiation. Recently, ADAM10-mediated cleavage of N-cadherin has been reported to play an important role in cell adhesion, migration, development and signaling. However, the significance of N-cadherin cleavage in chondrocyte differentiation has not been determined. In the present study, we found that the protein turnover of N-cadherin is accelerated during the early phase of chondrogenic differentiation in ATDC5 cells. Therefore, we generated the subclones of ATDC5 cells overexpressing wild-type N-cadherin, and two types of subclones overexpressing a cleavage-defective N-cadherin mutant, and examined the response of these cells to insulin stimulation. The ATDC5 cells overexpressing cleavage-defective mutants severely prevented the formation of cartilage aggregates, proteoglycan production and the induction of chondrocyte marker gene expression, such as type II collagen, aggrecan and type X collagen. These results suggested that the cleavage of N-cadherin is essential for chondrocyte differentiation.
Research highlights
► The precartilage condensation mediated by N-cadherin is essential for chondrocyte differentiation.
► The biochemical significance of cleavage of N-cadherin in chondrocyte differentiation is not fully understood.
► We examined the significance of cleavage of N-cadherin in chondrocyte differentiation by generating cleavage-defective mutants.
► ATDC5 cells overexpressing cleavage-defective mutants strongly prevented cartilage aggregate formation, proteoglycan production and the induction of chondrocyte marker genes.
► We concluded that the cleavage of N-cadherin is essential for chondrocyte differentiation.
Journal: Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications - Volume 400, Issue 4, 1 October 2010, Pages 493–499