کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
2091936 1081756 2006 10 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Comparison of most probable number-PCR and most probable number-foci detection method for quantifying infectious Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in environmental samples
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری بیوشیمی، ژنتیک و زیست شناسی مولکولی بیوتکنولوژی یا زیست‌فناوری
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Comparison of most probable number-PCR and most probable number-foci detection method for quantifying infectious Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in environmental samples
چکیده انگلیسی

Microbial contamination of public water supplies is of significant concern, as numerous outbreaks, including Cryptosporidium, have been reported worldwide. Detection and enumeration of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in water supplies is important for the prevention of future cryptosporidiosis outbreaks. In addition to not identifying the oocyst species, the U.S. EPA Method 1622 does not provide information on oocyst viability or infectivity. As such, current detection strategies have been coupled with in vitro culture methods to assess oocyst infectivity. In this study, a most probable number (MPN) method was coupled with PCR (MPN-PCR) to quantify the number of infectious oocysts recovered from seeded raw water concentrates. The frequency of positive MPN-PCR results decreased as the oocyst numbers decreased. Similar results were observed when MPN was coupled to the foci detection method (MPN-FDM), which was done for comparison. For both methods, infectious oocysts were not detected below 103 seeded oocysts and the MPN-PCR and MPN-FDM estimates for each seed dose were generally within one-log unit of directly enumerated foci of infection. MPN-PCR estimates were 0.25, 0.54, 0 and 0.66 log10 units higher than MPN-FDM estimates for the positive control, 105, 104 and 103 seed doses, respectively. The results show the MPN-PCR was the better method for the detection of infectious C. parvum oocysts in environmental water samples.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Microbiological Methods - Volume 67, Issue 2, November 2006, Pages 363–372
نویسندگان
, , ,