کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
2413839 1552053 2015 16 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Review on greenhouse gas emissions from pig houses: Production of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide by animals and manure
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
بررسی میزان انتشار گازهای گلخانه ای از خانه های خوک: تولید دی اکسید کربن، متان و اکسید نیتروژن توسط حیوانات و کود
کلمات کلیدی
دی اکسید کربن، متان، اکسید نیتروژن، خوک، کود کشاورزی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علوم کشاورزی و بیولوژیک علوم زراعت و اصلاح نباتات
چکیده انگلیسی


• Greenhouse gas emissions from piggeries correspond to 4.87 kg CO2equiv. per kg carcass.
• CO2 emissions from the pigs and the manure contribute to 81% of total emissions.
• Bedded systems are associated to higher N2O emissions compared to slatted systems.
• Dietary fibre increases the CH4 production from the digestive tract and the manure.
• Frequent removal of manure is efficient in reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

The environmental impacts of livestock production are attracting increasing attention, especially the emission of greenhouse gases (GHGs). Currently, pork is the most widely consumed meat product in the world, and its production is expected to grow in the next few decades. This paper deals with the production of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) by animals and by manure from pig buildings, with a focus on the influence of rearing techniques and nutrition. GHG emissions in piggeries originate from animals through CO2 exhalation and CH4 enteric fermentation, and from manure through the release of CO2, CH4 and N2O. The level of the CO2 exhalation (E-CO2, pig) depends on the physiological stage, the body weight (BW), the production level and the feed intake of the animals concerned. Enteric CH4 (E-CH4, pig) is principally related to dietary fibre intake and the fermentative capacity of the pig’s hindgut. Based on a review of the literature, the following equations are proposed in order to estimate E-CO2, pig (in kg day−1) and E-CH4,pig (in g day−1) for fattening pigs: E-CO2, pig = 0.136 × BW0.573; E-CH4,pig = 0.012 × dRes; with BW (in kg) and dRes for digestible residues (in g day−1). Numerous pathways are responsible for GHG production in manure. In addition, the microbial, physical and chemical properties of manure interact and modulate the level of emissions. Influencing factors for removal systems for both liquid and solid fractions of manure have been investigated. A large range of parameters showing an impact on the level of GHG production from pig houses has been reported. However, few of these can be considered unquestionably as GHG mitigation techniques because some strategies have shown contradictory effects depending on the gas, the circumstances and the study. Nevertheless, frequent manure removal seems to be an efficient means to reduce concurrently CO2-, CH4- and N2O-emissions from pig buildings for both slatted and bedded floor systems. Manure removal operations may be associated with specific storage conditions and efficient treatment in order to further reduce emissions. Several feeding strategies have been tested to decrease GHG emissions but they seem to be ineffective in reducing emissions both significantly and durably. In general, good management practices that enhance zootechnical performance will have beneficial consequences on GHG emission intensity. Taking into account the results described in the literature regarding CO2-, CH4- and N2O-production from animals and manure in pig houses, we estimate total GHG emissions to 448.3 kg CO2equiv. per slaughter pig produced or 4.87 kg CO2equiv. per kg carcass. The fattening period accounts for more than 70% of total emissions, while the gestation, lactation and weaning periods each contribute to about 10% of total emissions. Emissions of CO2, CH4 and N2O contribute to 81, 17 and 2% of total emissions from pig buildings, representing 3.87, 0.83 and 0.11 kg CO2equiv. per kg carcass, respectively.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment - Volume 199, 1 January 2015, Pages 10–25
نویسندگان
, ,