کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
2419673 1552404 2013 7 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Comparison of leucine requirement in olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) by free or synthetic dipeptide forms of leucine
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علوم کشاورزی و بیولوژیک علوم دامی و جانورشناسی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Comparison of leucine requirement in olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) by free or synthetic dipeptide forms of leucine
چکیده انگلیسی

We report a promising dietary model for amino acid (AA) requirement studies in fishes. An eight-week feeding trial was carried out to compare the efficacy of free leucine (Leu) and dipeptide Leucinyl-Glycine (Leu-Gly) in diets for olive flounder. Growth performance and whole-body AA compositions were examined. Triplicate groups of fish (average weight, 0.27 ± 0.001 g) (23 fish per replicate) were fed seven isonitrogenous and isocaloric experimental diets containing 6 (basal), 9, 12 and 15 g Leu/kg diet in the two different forms. The basal diet contained 6 g Leu/kg from fish meal and the other six diets were prepared by adding 3 g incremental levels of Leu or Leu-Gly. Growth rate was significantly (P<0.05) increased in the groups fed Leu-Gly in comparison to free Leu while no significant differences were observed by the supplementation level. Whole-body accumulations of most indispensable and dispensable AA were higher in the fish fed Leu-Gly, however, no significant differences were detected. A second-order polynomial regression analysis on the basis of weight gain revealed better utilization efficiency for Leu-Gly. Higher weight gain (0.63 g) was obtained in fish fed Leu-Gly than fish fed Leu (0.55 g). The results demonstrated that dipeptide Leu has higher efficiency in protein synthesis than free Leu and further confirmed that AA availability could be better in fish when fed dipeptide than free forms.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Animal Feed Science and Technology - Volume 183, Issues 3–4, 12 July 2013, Pages 195–201
نویسندگان
, ,