کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
2514618 | 1118475 | 2008 | 14 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Differences in motilin receptor desensitization after stimulation with motilin or motilides are due to alternative receptor trafficking Differences in motilin receptor desensitization after stimulation with motilin or motilides are due to alternative receptor trafficking](/preview/png/2514618.png)
Backgrounds & aimsThe motilin receptor (MTLR) is an important therapeutic target for treatment of hypomotility disorders. The negative outcome in clinical trials with the motilin agonist, ABT-229, indicated that desensitization may limit the therapeutic usefulness of motilides. We therefore compared the mechanisms involved in the intracellular trafficking of the MTLR after stimulation with motilin, erythromycin-A (EM-A) or ABT-229.MethodsDesensitization was studied by measuring changes in Ca2+ rises and by receptor binding studies in CHO cells co-expressing the Ca2+ indicator apoaequorin and the MTLR, C-terminally tagged with EGFP. Receptor phosphorylation was studied by immunoprecipitation. MTLR-EGFP trafficking to organelles and translocation of β-arrestins were visualized by fluorescence microscopy.ResultsAgonist-induced desensitization of the MTLR was due to receptor internalization with potencies (p-int50) in the order of: ABT-229 (8.3) > motilin (7.86) > EM-A (4.77) but with no differences in the internalization kinetics (t1/2: ∼25 min). The percentage cell surface receptor loss was more profound after exposure to ABT-229 (88 ± 1%) than to motilin (63 ± 10%) or EM-A (34 ± 2%). For motilin and EM-A MTLR phosphorylation probably occurs via G protein-coupled receptor kinases while for ABT-229 phosphorylation was also protein kinase C dependent. All agonists translocated cytosolic β-arrestin-2 with greater affinity to the plasma membrane than β-arrestin-1. After internalization the MTLR co-localized with transferrin but not with cathepsin D. After stimulation with motilin and EM-A the t1/2 for MTLR resensitization was 3 h and 1 h, respectively but amounted 26 h for ABT-229.ConclusionOur results suggest that the resensitization kinetics determine the desensitization properties of the motilin agonists.
Journal: Biochemical Pharmacology - Volume 75, Issue 5, 1 March 2008, Pages 1115–1128