کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
2592315 | 1132002 | 2013 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
An expert peer consultation panel reviewed a report by the PAC Analysis Task Group, which hypothesized that systemic, developmental, and reproductive toxicity observed in repeated-dose dermal toxicity studies was related to polycyclic aromatic compound (PAC) content. Peer consultations seek to solicit scientific and technical input from experts on the scientific basis and merits of the subject report. This peer consultation panel included nine scientists with expertise in petroleum chemistry, biostatistics, toxicology, risk assessment, structure activity, and reproductive and developmental toxicology. The panel evaluated the technical quality of the PAC report and provided recommendations for improving the statistical and biological approaches. The PAC report authors revised their methods and documentation, which are published elsewhere in this supplement. A review of the post peer consultation manuscripts confirmed that many of the key suggestions from expert panel members were considered and incorporated. In cases where the PAC report authors did not fully incorporate panel suggestions from the peer consultation, they have provided an explanation and support for their decision. This peer consultation demonstrates the value of formal engagement of peers in development of new scientific methods and approaches.
• Expert input of aromatic-ring class and toxicity correlation for petroleum substances.
• Peer consultation demonstrated value of outside experts in development of new method.
• Revised manuscript reviews confirmed recommendations incorporated in the final papers.
• Relevant broad diversity of experts needed for comprehensive peer consultation.
Journal: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology - Volume 67, Issue 2, Supplement, 1 November 2013, Pages S86–S93