کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
2639877 1563539 2010 7 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Internet survey of Foley catheter practices and knowledge among Minnesota nurses
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری ایمنی شناسی و میکروب شناسی میکروب شناسی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Internet survey of Foley catheter practices and knowledge among Minnesota nurses
چکیده انگلیسی

BackgroundAlthough nurses insert and care for many Foley catheters, little is known about nurses' attitudes and knowledge regarding indications for catheter use or methods to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI).MethodsAn Internet-based survey was sent to a random sample of registered nurses (RNs) in Minnesota. The survey contained demographic questions and 5-point Likert-scale questions regarding indications for Foley catheter placement and effectiveness of various interventions for preventing CAUTI.ResultsNurses perceived early catheter removal as the most effective intervention to prevent CAUTI (mean score, 4.5; range 1-5). Compared with other RNs, those reporting additional catheter education were more likely to rate interventions to prevent CAUTI as effective, regardless of whether the interventions actually reduce the incidence of symptomatic CAUTI or asymptomatic bacteriuria/funguria. Intensive care unit RNs were significantly more likely than other RNs to endorse that a Foley catheter was indicated for any given clinical scenario and to endorse antimicrobial-coated catheters as effective in preventing CAUTI. Most respondents reported no institutional guidance regarding catheterization.ConclusionAlthough the surveyed Minnesota RNs demonstrated high-level awareness of the utility of early Foley catheter removal for preventing CAUTI, other aspects of their catheter-related knowledge were concerning. Improving these deficits may help improve catheter-related practice.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: American Journal of Infection Control - Volume 38, Issue 1, February 2010, Pages 31–37
نویسندگان
, , ,