کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
266407 | 504358 | 2015 | 17 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
• The response of uprights is quite difficult to predict because of the buckling of open mono-symmetric cross-sections.
• Several design cases have been selected differing for cross-section geometry, slenderness and load conditions.
• Śiva FE software with a beam element capable to capturing key features of mono-symmetric uprights has been used.
• Non negligible differences have been observed related to the admitted approaches in terms of load carrying capacity.
• Research outcomes offer practical indications for an optimal material use in accordance with the safety requirements.
In this paper attention is focused on the uprights, i.e. vertical elements of the skeleton frames of steel storage rack systems. Their response is quite difficult to predict because of the significant influence of the interaction between local, distortional and overall buckling phenomena, owing to the presence of open mono-symmetric thin-walled cold-formed cross-sections. As a consequence, very high engineering competences are necessarily required to guarantee relevant load carrying capacities with structural systems of extremely limited weight and of very modest costs. Design provisions admit few alternatives, leading to different sizes and weight of the racks and, as consequence, to different degrees of economic competitiveness on the market.In the framework of a more general research project on steel storage rack structures, three options of designing the uprights in Europe have been investigated in the present paper. Several cases from practice have been selected, which comprise of uprights differing for cross-section geometry, slenderness and load conditions. A suitable finite element program for academic use characterized by a refined beam formulation capable of capturing key features of uprights has been used to model the elastic buckling interaction between the axial load and the bending moment. Non-negligible differences have been detected for what concerns the admitted design approaches in terms of beam–column load carrying capacity; furthermore, the direct comparison of the research outcomes offers practical indications for an optimal use of the material in accordance with the required safety standards.
Journal: Engineering Structures - Volume 86, 1 March 2015, Pages 225–241