کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
266816 504379 2014 19 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Confinement effect of ring-confined concrete-filled-steel-tube columns under uni-axial load
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه علوم زمین و سیارات مهندسی ژئوتکنیک و زمین شناسی مهندسی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Confinement effect of ring-confined concrete-filled-steel-tube columns under uni-axial load
چکیده انگلیسی


• Uni-axial behaviour of concrete-filled-steel-tube (CFST) columns with external steel rings confinement from 62 column tests.
• Improved interface bonding, strength, stiffness and ductility of CFST columns with provision of external confinement.
• Theoretical models proposed for evaluating uni-axial capacity of CFST columns with external ring confinement and verified.

Concrete-filled-steel-tube (CFST) columns show superior strength and ductility performance because of composite action. However, this cannot be fully developed at early elastic stage as steel dilates more than concrete and thereby causing imperfect interface bonding, which reduces the elastic strength and stiffness. To resolve the problem, confinement in the form of rings is proposed in this study to restrict the elastic lateral dilation of concrete. For verification, 62 CFST columns of various dimensions cast with normal-(NSC) or high-strength concrete (HSC) installed with rings were tested under uni-axial compression in this study. From the results, it was evident that: (1) Rings could improve the axial load-carrying capacity, stiffness and decrease the strength degradation rate. (2) The critical confinement index (ξcr) was varied with concrete grade. (3) Rings were effective to limit the lateral deformation of concrete and the steel tube. Based on the obtained results, three analytical models taking into account the confining effects provided by the steel tube and rings developed by the authors are proposed to estimate the axial load-carrying capacity of unconfined and ring-confined CFST columns. The validity of the best proposed model is justified by comparing the predicted theoretical strength with the measured strength in the tests and experimental results by other researchers.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Engineering Structures - Volume 67, 15 May 2014, Pages 123–141
نویسندگان
, ,