کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
266978 504388 2013 16 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Comparison of vibrational comfort assessment criteria for design of timber floors among the European countries
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه علوم زمین و سیارات مهندسی ژئوتکنیک و زمین شناسی مهندسی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Comparison of vibrational comfort assessment criteria for design of timber floors among the European countries
چکیده انگلیسی


• Needs and current regulations for vibrational comfort for buildings are indicated.
• Timber floor design practices to EC5 in 13 European countries are summarised.
• Parameters measured include fundamental frequency, deflection and velocity.
• Floors with solid timber joists, I-joists and metal web joists are designed to EC5.
• Results show big variations in design so further harmonisation is needed.

As part of the research work carried out by the Working Group 3 of COST Action FP0702, the need for vibrational comfort design for buildings and current regulations for comfort assessment of structural vibrations of timber floors in Europe have been summarised. Also the design practices of timber floors with respect to vibrational serviceability criteria, including those for fundamental frequency, unit point load deflection and unit impulse velocity, in up to thirteen European countries have been gathered and their differences been further assessed by analysing flooring systems constructed with three types of joists, i.e. solid timber joists, engineered I-joists and metal web joists. The unit point load deflection criterion is the most crucial one for structural design of timber floors with various types of joists and usually dominates the whole design. Finland tends to be the strictest, followed by Italy, the Netherlands, Austria and Norway, while Denmark, the UK and Ireland are the most generous. Even though EN 1995-1-1 has given general criteria for vibrational serviceability design of timber floors, the variations in the design equations and design limits are still large in the European countries, and hence further harmonisation is still needed.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Engineering Structures - Volume 52, July 2013, Pages 592–607
نویسندگان
, , , ,