کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
2748462 | 1149192 | 2012 | 11 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Pulsatile vs. continuous flow in ventricular assist device therapy
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت
پزشکی و دندانپزشکی
بیهوشی و پزشکی درد
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Pulsatile vs. continuous flow in ventricular assist device therapy Pulsatile vs. continuous flow in ventricular assist device therapy](/preview/png/2748462.png)
چکیده انگلیسی
A left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is an important treatment option for a patient with end-stage heart failure. Both continuous and non-pulsatile devices are available, each with different effects on a patient's physiology. In general, these effects are not clinically significant with the exception of bleeding events which are more common with continuous-flow devices in some series. Both devices increase survival beyond medical management. Continuous-flow devices are smaller and are associated with less overall morbidity than pulsatile devices.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology - Volume 26, Issue 2, June 2012, Pages 105–115
Journal: Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology - Volume 26, Issue 2, June 2012, Pages 105–115
نویسندگان
Gabriel Loor, Gonzalo Gonzalez-Stawinski,