کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
2750655 | 1149356 | 2013 | 5 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

AimOur study was to investigate the heterogeneity of estrogen receptor (ER) expression among tumor sites by using fluorine-18 (18F) fluoroestradiol (FES) positron-emission tomography–computed tomography (PET-CT) imaging.MethodsThirty-two breast cancer patients underwent both 18F-FES and 18F fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET-CTs from June 2010 to December 2011 in our center (mean age, 53 years; range, 27-77 years). We used the maximum standardized uptake value to quantify ER expression and a cutoff value of 1.5 to dichotomize results into ER+ and ER−. The difference of heterogeneity between the initial patients and patients with recurrent or metastatic disease after treatments was assessed by using the χ2 test. Also, the 18F-FES uptake was compared with the 18F-FDG uptake by use of Spearman correlation coefficients.ResultsA total number of 237 lesions in 32 patients were detected. Among them, most lesions (64.1% [152/237]) were bone metastasis. A striking 33.4-fold difference in 18F-FES uptake was observed among different patients (maximum standardized uptake value range, 0.5 to approximately 16.7), and a 8.2-fold difference was observed among lesions within the same individual (1.0 to approximately 8.2). As for 18F-FDG uptake, the difference was 11.6-fold (1.3 to approximately 15.1) and 9.9-fold (1.4 to approximately 13.8), respectively. In 28.1% (9/32) of the patients, both 18F-FES+ and 18F-FES− metastases were present, which suggests partial discordant ER expression. After treatments, 37.5% (9/24) patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer showed heterogeneity, whereas no untreated patient was detected to exist discordant ER expression (χ2, 4.174; P < .05). In addition, the 18F-FES uptake showed a weak correlation with the 18F-FDG uptake (ρ = 0.248; P < .05).Conclusion18F-FES and 18F-FDG uptake varied greatly both within and among patients. 18F-FES PET-CT demonstrated a conspicuous number of patients with the heterogeneity of ER expression.
Journal: Clinical Breast Cancer - Volume 13, Issue 5, October 2013, Pages 359–363