کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
2950744 | 1577288 | 2010 | 9 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
ObjectivesWe sought to determine whether infants (younger than 1 year old) had similar clinical benefits with individualized anticoagulation management as older children and adult undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).BackgroundIndividualized heparin and protamine management in older children and adults undergoing CPB has been associated with improved clinical outcomes.MethodsNinety infants younger than 1 year of age undergoing CPB were enrolled in a randomized, controlled trial comparing weight-based anticoagulation management using activated clotting time (ACT) to individualized management with Hemostasis Management System Plus. Manufacturer's guidelines were followed for the first 33 patients. A modified protocol was used for the last 57 patients with adjustments for coagulation system immaturity and hemodilution on CPB.ResultsThe hemostasis management system (HMS) device consistently underestimated plasma anti-Xa levels, leading to an overestimated required heparin dose. After a blinded interim analysis revealed poor outcomes in the experimental HMS group using manufacturer guidelines, the safety committee suspended the study pending protocol modifications. The use of the HMS device following the modified protocol resulted in more stable anti-Xa levels during CPB with improved post-operative outcomes including reduced need for transfusions (71 ml/kg vs. 80 ml/kg; p = 0.003), ventilation time (33 h vs. 49 h; p = 0.04), intensive care (88 h vs. 99 h; p = 0.003), and hospital length of stay (192 h vs. 216 h; p < 0.001), compared with the weight-based protocol.ConclusionsThis study supports the use of the HMS device, with a modified protocol for infants younger than 1 year of age, for anticoagulation management during CPB. Clinical guidelines for the use of the HMS device should be modified for infants younger than 1 year of age.
Journal: Journal of the American College of Cardiology - Volume 56, Issue 22, 23 November 2010, Pages 1794–1802