کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
2963789 1178574 2009 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
In early-stage diabetic retinopathy, risk of cardiac events after implantation of sirolimus-eluting stent is higher than after coronary artery bypass surgery
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی کاردیولوژی و پزشکی قلب و عروق
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
In early-stage diabetic retinopathy, risk of cardiac events after implantation of sirolimus-eluting stent is higher than after coronary artery bypass surgery
چکیده انگلیسی

SummaryBackgroundPatients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) have an increased risk of death from coronary heart disease and myocardial infarction. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of revascularization strategies (sirolimus-eluting stent [SES] and coronary artery bypass surgery [CABG]) in patients with DR according to the stage of retinopathy: non-proliferative retinopathy (NPDR) and proliferative retinopathy (PDR).MethodsFrom April 2004 until February 2007, 627 patients including 51 NPDR and 62 PDR patients underwent SES implantation. For each retinopathy group, a historical comparison group at the same stages of retinopathy undergoing CABG was selected. Cardiac events were defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization.ResultsThe average follow-up from the time of the initial revascularization was 27.7 ± 8.5 months for NPDR-SES patients, 69.6 ± 36.6 months for NPDR-CABG patients, 26.4 ± 9.7 months for PDR-SES patients, and 68.3 ± 44.2 months for PDR-CABG patients; and Kaplan–Meier estimates of the percentages of events at 24 months were 47.0%, 22.8%, 28.5%, and 26.0%. Kaplan–Meier curves for cardiac events differed significantly between the SES group and the CABG group in NPDR patients (p = 0.04), whereas the curves did not differ significantly between the two groups of PDR patients. The adjusted hazard ratio of SES implantation for cardiac events in the entire group of DR patients was 1.75 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02–3.00, p = 0.04).ConclusionsSES implantation is not a suitable method of revascularization in DR patients, especially in NPDR patients. CABG may become the first-choice revascularization technique for these patients.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Cardiology - Volume 53, Issue 1, February 2009, Pages 86–93
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,