کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
305646 513042 2015 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
A seven-year study on the effects of fall soil tillage on yield-scaled greenhouse gas emission from flood irrigated rice in a humid subtropical climate
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
یک مطالعه هفت ساله در مورد اثرات خاکستر خاک پایدار بر میزان تولید گازهای گلخانه ای در مقیاس تولید شده از برنج آبیاری سیل در آب و هوای نیمه گرمسیری مرطوب
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه مهندسی انرژی انرژی های تجدید پذیر، توسعه پایدار و محیط زیست
چکیده انگلیسی


• Anticipating soil tillage from spring to fall mitigated yield-scaled GHG emissions.
• Soil CH4 emissions were 24% lower in the fall tillage at 316 kg CH4 ha−1 GS−1.
• No effect on N2O emissions and rice yields (average of 7.8 Mg ha−1) was observed.
• pGWP and yield-scaled pGWP emissions were reduced by 21 and 25% in the fall tillage.

In southern Brazil, flood irrigated rice is grown during the summer, while a self-reseeding ryegrass is grown during the winter months without irrigation. Soil tillage operations that incorporate the rice and ryegrass residues into the soil are performed only in the spring season, which may increase methanogenesis due to higher substrate availability in reduced subsurface soil layers. It was hypothesized that anticipating the soil tillage from spring to the fall season reduces yield-scaled greenhouse gas emissions during the summer rice season due to lower availability of C compounds to methanogenic bacteria in subsurface soil layers. A seven-year study was conducted to determine soil methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, partial global warming potential [pGWP = (CH4*25) + (N2O*298)], rice yields, and yield-scaled pGWP emissions (yield-scaled pGWP = pGWP/yield) from flood irrigated rice under spring and fall tillage treatments. No significant effect of tillage treatments on soil N2O emissions and rice yields was detected. When averaged across treatments and growing seasons (GSs), rice yield was 7.9 Mg ha−1 GS−1, whereas cumulative N2O emissions were 3.65 kg N2O ha−1 GS−1. Soil CH4 emissions were responsible for 91.5% of pGWP. The spring tillage treatment resulted in an earlier and larger first peak of CH4 efflux, likely due to higher labile C availability originated from the rice and ryegrass biomass decomposition in subsurface soil layers. In contrast, in the fall tillage treatment the easily decomposable compounds of the rice residue was utilized during the winter months, which combined with the ryegrass biomass kept on the soil surface resulted in lower labile C availability in subsurface soil layers. The fall tillage treatment significantly reduced cumulative CH4, pGWP and yield-scaled pGWP emissions by 24, 21, and 25%, respectively. Averaged across GSs, CH4, pGWP and yield-scaled pGWP emissions for the fall and spring tillage treatments were 316 and 417 kg CH4 ha−1 GS−1, 8.6 and 10.9 Mg CO2eq ha−1 GS−1, and 1.06 and 1.41 kg CO2eq kg−1 grain, respectively. Our results indicate that shifting soil tillage operations from spring to fall can successfully mitigate yield-scaled pGWP emissions from regional flooded rice fields.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Soil and Tillage Research - Volume 145, January 2015, Pages 118–125
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , ,