Are the destructive neurosurgical techniques as effective as microvascular decompression in the management of trigeminal neuralgia?

BackgroundThere are no randomized controlled trials comparing TC, PTGC, and MVD for idiopathic TN at a single institution using quality criteria. The aim of the study was to assess the long-term outcome (efficiency and morbidity) of treated patients with one of these techniques in the same institution.MethodsThe authors present a retrospective study of 165 consecutive patients from 1983 to 2004. The inclusion criteria were drug-resistant idiopathic TN and intolerance to medical treatment. Three groups were set up according to the techniques used: group I (n = 73), treated by TC; group II (n = 41), treated by PTGC; group III (n = 51), treated by MVD. The main judgment criterion was pain relief. The second judgment criterion was morbidity. χ2 or Fisher exact test, Kaplan-Meier, and log-rank were used for statistical analysis.ResultsThe 3 groups were homogeneous according to age, duration of evolution, and pain topography. Concerning sex, groups I and II were different (women, 58%; vs. 37%; P = .021). The immediate efficiency for the 3 groups was, respectively, 96%, 94%, and 95% (NS). At 6 years follow-up, 70%, 77%, and 72% of the patients, respectively, remained pain-free (NS). As determined by the Kaplan-Meier survival curve, there was no difference between the 3 groups (log-rank, P = .867). Hypoesthesia was more frequent for PTGC (89%).ConclusionsIn our study, we did not find MVD to be more effective than the other techniques. However, it had the lowest long-term complication rate, which is a strong argument in choosing this technique as the initial procedure for young and healthy patients. Percutaneous techniques, however, are still recommended in specific circumstances.