کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
3097405 1581489 2010 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Endoscopic-Assisted Lateral Transatlantal Approach to Craniovertebral Junction
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علم عصب شناسی عصب شناسی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Endoscopic-Assisted Lateral Transatlantal Approach to Craniovertebral Junction
چکیده انگلیسی

BackgroundThe lateral approach to the craniocervical junction is directed along the atlantal and occipital condyles to the dens. The advantages of the lateral approach compared with the anterior transoral and transnasal approaches are that it provides a sterile field, and anterior decompression and postdecompression fixation can be performed in one procedure.ObjectiveTo examine the usefulness of endoscopy as an auxiliary tool during lateral transatlantal odontoidectomy.MethodsSix cadaver heads, in which the vessels were injected with colored silicone, were dissected using a surgical microscope and 0- and 30-degree endoscopes. A flap incision was chosen to accomplish exposure of the area of the decompression, the occipital squama and adjacent laminae for fixation, and the vertebral artery from C2 to its dural entrance for its stabilization.ResultsStudy findings revealed that endoscopy adds several advantages to microscopy in the lateral transatlantal approach to the craniovertebral junction in cases of craniovertebral malformation by providing magnification and illumination not limited by corners, thus helping to avert substandard decompression and complications such as dural tears and cerebrospinal fluid leaks; flexibility in surgical positioning of patients; and improved ergonomics that enable the surgeon to complete the procedure in a more efficient, comfortable, and safe manner.ConclusionEndoscopy is a useful adjunct to microscopy in completing lateral approaches to the craniovertebral junction.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: World Neurosurgery - Volume 74, Issues 2–3, August–September 2010, Pages 351–358
نویسندگان
, , , , ,