کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
319417 539420 2014 12 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Evaluation of a cross-sector community initiative partnership: Delivering a local sport program
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
بررسی یک همکاری متقابل بخش ابتکار جامعه: ارائه برنامه ورزش های محلی
کلمات کلیدی
نظریه برنامه؛ ارزیابی مشارکت؛ مسئولیت اجتماعی شرکت ها؛ ورزش
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی سیاست های بهداشت و سلامت عمومی
چکیده انگلیسی


• It is important to evaluate the implementation processes of corporate community initiatives delivered through cross-sectorial partnerships.
• Chen's (2005) program theory is a helpful framework to evaluate the implementation processes of corporate community initiatives delivered by a non-profit partner.
• Discrepancies can exist between the associate organization and the implementers regarding understanding and fulfilling responsibilities.
• Ongoing evaluations are necessary to pinpoint the catalyst of the discrepancies.

Corporate community initiatives (CCI) are often established via cross-sector partnerships with nonprofit agencies to address critical social problems. While there is a growing body of literature exploring the effectiveness and social impact of these partnerships, there is a limited evaluative research on the implementation and execution processes of CCIs. In this paper, we examined the implementation and operational processes in the delivery of a professional sport organization's CCI initiative using program theory evaluation. The findings showed discrepancies between the associate organization and the implementers regarding understanding and fulfilling responsibilities with performing certain aspects (maintaining accurate records and program marketing) of the service delivery protocol. Despite program stakeholders being satisfied overall with the program delivery, contradictions between program stakeholders’ satisfaction in the quality of program delivery was found in critical components (marketing and communications) of the service delivery. We conclude that ongoing evaluations are necessary to pinpoint the catalyst of the discrepancies along with all partners valuing process evaluation in addition to outcome evaluation.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Evaluation and Program Planning - Volume 44, June 2014, Pages 36–47
نویسندگان
, , , ,