Targeting the worst-off for free health care: A process evaluation in Burkina Faso

Effective mechanisms to exempt the indigent from user fees at health care facilities are rare in Africa. A State-led intervention (2004–2005) and two action research projects (2007–2010) were implemented in a health district in Burkina Faso to exempt the indigent from user fees. This article presents the results of the process evaluation of these three interventions.Individual and group interviews were organized with the key stakeholders (health staff, community members) to document the strengths and weaknesses of key components of the interventions (relevance and uptake of the intervention, worst-off selection and information, financial arrangements). Data was subjected to content analysis and thematic analysis.The results show that all three intervention processes can be improved. Community-based targeting was better accepted by the stakeholders than was the State-led intervention. The strengths of the community-based approach were in clearly defining the selection criteria, informing the waiver beneficiaries, using a participative process and using endogenous funding. A weakness was that using endogenous funding led to restrictive selection by the community.The community-based approach appears to be the most effective, but it needs to be improved and retested to generate more knowledge before scaling up.

► Community-based targeting was better accepted than was the State-led intervention.
► Community-based targeting challenge the usefulness of defining criteria for indigence in rural areas.
► Stakeholders information and the funding for indigent coverage are fundamental for an effective mechanism.