کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
322497 540070 2014 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Client satisfaction with a new group-based model of case management for supported housing services
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
رضایت مشتری با استفاده از مدل مبتنی بر گروه جدید از مدیریت پرونده برای پشتیبانی خدمات مسکن
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی سیاست های بهداشت و سلامت عمومی
چکیده انگلیسی


• Supported housing clients reported high satisfaction with the GIPS model.
• What clients liked best about GIPS was the social interaction and peer support.
• GIPS offers a feasible and acceptable model of case management, warranting further research.

Supportive housing typically offers rental subsidies and individual intensive community-based case management and has become a predominant service model for homeless adults. Alternative case management models have not been adequately explored. This study evaluates satisfaction with a novel group-intensive peer support (GIPS) model of case management for the Housing and Urban Development-Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing (HUD-VASH) program. A total of 95 HUD-VASH clients rated their satisfaction with services and responded to open-ended questions about what they liked best and least about the program. Quantitative and qualitative analyses compared clients who attended groups as part of the GIPS model and those who did not. No significant difference in satisfaction between group and non-group attenders were found. Clients reported what they liked best about the program was the staff; those who attended groups reported what they liked best was the social interaction and peer support. These findings suggest clients who attend groups for their primary source of case management may be as satisfied as those who receive only individual case management. GIPS offers a feasible and acceptable service model and should be further explored along with other alternative models of care in supportive housing services.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Evaluation and Program Planning - Volume 43, April 2014, Pages 118–123
نویسندگان
, , ,