کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
3328605 | 1212326 | 2015 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
• A consensus needs to be established on the use of HMA as a bridging therapy for high-risk MDS.
• We surveyed 34 Korean MDS experts on their bridging therapies for high-risk MDS.
• HMA treatment as a bridge to allogeneic SCT would seem to be a feasible option for high-risk MDS.
• HMA therapy can be recommended in practice while awaiting allogeneic transplantation.
According to current guidelines on therapeutic strategies for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), cytoreductive therapies before allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) are not widely recommended for patients with high-risk MDS or refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB) who are eligible for allogeneic SCT because of controversial evidence on the role of such therapies. Yet, while treatment with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) has a critical limitation in eradicating MDS clones, the use of HMA treatment as a bridge to allogeneic SCT has become a focus with the hope of improving the SCT outcome based on the chance of achieving complete remission or reducing the blast percentage safely and effectively before allogeneic SCT. However, a consensus needs to be established on the use of HMAs as a bridging therapy for high-risk MDS or RAEB. Thus, the Korean AML/MDS working party group surveyed 34 Korean MDS experts on their bridging therapies for high-risk MDS. Accordingly, this paper presents the survey questionnaire and resulting data, along with a summary of the consensus and related recommendations regarding strategies using HMA treatment and allogeneic SCT based on reported studies and the current survey results.
Journal: Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology - Volume 95, Issue 2, August 2015, Pages 243–250