کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
363486 620701 2014 13 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Assessing spelling in kindergarten: Further comparison of scoring metrics and their relation to reading skills
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
ارزیابی املا در مهد کودک: مقایسه بیشتر معیارهای نمره دهی و ارتباط آنها با مهارت های خواندن
کلمات کلیدی
سوادآموزی اولیه، املا، خواندن، ارزیابی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم انسانی و اجتماعی روانشناسی روان شناسی کاربردی
چکیده انگلیسی

Early reading and spelling development share foundational skills, yet spelling assessment is underutilized in evaluating early reading. This study extended research comparing the degree to which methods for scoring spelling skills at the end of kindergarten were associated with reading skills measured at the same time as well as at the end of first grade. Five strategies for scoring spelling responses were compared: totaling the number of words spelled correctly, totaling the number of correct letter sounds, totaling the number of correct letter sequences, using a rubric for scoring invented spellings, and calculating the Spelling Sensitivity Score (Masterson & Apel, 2010b). Students (N = 287) who were identified at kindergarten entry as at risk for reading difficulty and who had received supplemental reading intervention were administered a standardized spelling assessment in the spring of kindergarten, and measures of phonological awareness, decoding, word recognition, and reading fluency were administered concurrently and at the end of first grade. The five spelling scoring metrics were similar in their strong relations with factors summarizing reading subskills (phonological awareness, decoding, and word reading) on a concurrent basis. Furthermore, when predicting first-grade reading skills based on spring-of-kindergarten performance, spelling scores from all five metrics explained unique variance over the autoregressive effects of kindergarten word identification. The practical advantages of using a brief spelling assessment for early reading evaluation and the relative tradeoffs of each scoring metric are discussed.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of School Psychology - Volume 52, Issue 1, February 2014, Pages 49–61
نویسندگان
, , , ,