کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
364874 621095 2012 7 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Inferring cross sections of 3D objects: A new spatial thinking test
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم انسانی و اجتماعی روانشناسی روانشناسی رشد و آموزشی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Inferring cross sections of 3D objects: A new spatial thinking test
چکیده انگلیسی

A new spatial ability test was administered online to 223 undergraduate students enrolled in introductory science courses. The 30-item multiple choice test measures individual differences in ability to identify the two-dimensional cross section of a three-dimensional geometric solid, a skill that has been identified as important in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) fields. Bivariate and partial correlations suggest that the test measures a skill that is distinct from three-dimensional mental rotation and change in view perspective. Test items varied along two scales: complexity of the geometric solid to be sliced and orientation of the cutting plane. Internal reliability of both the overall test and its subscales was satisfactory. Performance was higher on figures cut by orthogonal, rather than oblique, planes. Patterns of performance across more and less complex items, and patterns of sex differences on these items, suggest that items on the test are differentially amenable to imagistic and analytic strategies, with males outperforming females on items that are less amenable to analytic strategies. The test shows promise for online administration and for adaptation to younger populations.

Figure optionsDownload as PowerPoint slideHighlights
► We report the validity and reliability of a novel spatial test.
► The skill measured on this test contributes to performance in the sciences.
► The test measures a skill distinct from mental rotation and perspective change.
► After covarying for spatial ability, males outperformed females on some items.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Learning and Individual Differences - Volume 22, Issue 6, December 2012, Pages 868–874
نویسندگان
, ,