کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
371823 | 621941 | 2011 | 10 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Psychometric properties and norms of the German ABC-Community and PAS-ADD Checklist Psychometric properties and norms of the German ABC-Community and PAS-ADD Checklist](/preview/png/371823.png)
AimThe aim of the present study was to standardize and generate psychometric evidence of the German language versions of two well-established English language mental health instruments: the Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Community (ABC-C) and the Psychiatric Assessment Schedule for Adults with Developmental Disabilities (PAS-ADD) Checklist. New methods in this field were introduced: a simulation method for testing the factor structure and an exploration of long-term stability over two years.MethodsThe checklists were both administered to a representative sample of 270 individuals with intellectual disability (ID) and, two years later in a second data collection, to 128 participants of the original sample. Principal component analysis and parallel analysis were performed. Reliability measures, long-term stability, subscale intercorrelations, as well as standardized norms were generated. Prevalence of mental health problems was examined.ResultsPsychometric properties were mostly excellent, with long-term stability showing moderate to strong effects. The original factor structure of the ABC-C was replicated. PAS-ADD Checklist produced a similar, but still different structure compared with findings from the English language area. The overall prevalence rate of mental health problems in the sample was about 20%.ConclusionConsidering the good results on the measured psychometric properties, the two checklists are recommended for the early detection of mental health problems in persons with ID.
► Evaluation of the German version of ABC-Community and PAS-ADD Checklist.
► Norms of ABC-Community and PAS-ADD Checklist were created.
► Parallel analysis was used for the first time to investigate factor structure.
► Both instruments showed good psychometric properties.
► Both instruments are recommended for use in the German language version.
Journal: Research in Developmental Disabilities - Volume 32, Issue 6, November–December 2011, Pages 2431–2440