کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
3979768 1257372 2015 11 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Extent of lymphadenectomy to associate with pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with pancreatic head cancer for better tumor staging
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
میزان لنفادنکتومی با پانکراس دیویدونوکتومی در بیماران مبتلا به سرطان پانکراس برای تشخیص بهتر تومور
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی تومور شناسی
چکیده انگلیسی


• Lymph node metastasis worsen prognosis of pancreatic cancer.
• Extended lymphadenectomy failed to prolong survival after respective surgery.
• Lymph node stations should be removed on the basis of their metastasis rate.
• An adequate total number of lymph nodes examined is needed for tumor staging.
• Standard lymphadenectomy should balance surgical risk and tumor staging.

ObjectivesTo define the extent of lymphadenectomy to associate with surgery for pancreatic head cancer.BackgroundPancreaticoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy fails to prolong patient survival.MethodsProspective randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials (RCTs and NRCTs), meta-analyses, retrospective reviews, consensus conferences and pre- and intraoperative diagnoses of lymph node (LN) metastases were retrieved. Standard and extended lymphadenectomies were reviewed, including their effects on postoperative complications, mortality rate and long-term survival. The minimum total number of LN examined (TNLE) for adequate tumor staging, and the incidence of metastasis to each LN station were also considered. A pros and cons analysis was performed on the removal of each LN station.ResultsEleven retrospective studies (2514 patients), five prospective NRCTs (545 patients), and five prospective RCTs (586 patients) described different lymphadenectomies, which obtained similar long-term results. Five meta-analyses showed they did not influence long-term survival. However, N status is an important component of tumor staging. The recommended minimum TNLE is 15. The percent incidence of metastasis to each LN station was calculated considering at least 385 and up to 3725 patients. Preoperative imaging and intraoperative exploration frequently fail to identify metastatic nodes. A pros and cons analysis suggests that lymph node status is better established removing the following LN stations: 6, 8a-p, 12a-b-c, 13a-b, 14a-b-c-d, 16b1, 17a-b. Metastasis to 16b1 LNs significantly worsens prognosis. Their removal and frozen section examination, before proceeding with resection, may contraindicate resection.ConclusionA standard lymphadenectomy demands an adequate TNLE and removal of the LN stations metastasizing more frequently, without increasing the surgical risk.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Cancer Treatment Reviews - Volume 41, Issue 7, July 2015, Pages 577–587
نویسندگان
,