The “two-week wait” referral pathway allows prompt treatment but does not improve outcome for patients with oesophago-gastric cancer

IntroductionThe Two Week Wait Referral Service (2WW) has been implemented as a means of fast-tracking patients with suspected upper gastrointestinal cancers for endoscopy. Whether or not it impacts on the outcome of these patients is unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of patients referred through 2WW with that of patients with oesophago-gastric cancer identified through alternate referral pathways (routine, emergency).MethodsThe study population was 340 patients with oesophago-gastric carcinoma (gastric 154) diagnosed during the time period 01/2006–12/2007 at University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust. Data were collected prospectively by the MDT co-ordinator and analysed retrospectively.Results135 of the 340 patients with oesophago-gastric cancer were diagnosed through the 2WW, 115 patients through routine referral pathways, and 90 patients were admitted on an emergency basis. Patients referred through 2WW had a median referral to 1st treatment time of 47 days (routine 79, emergency 28, p < 0.001 all group comparisons). The number of patients treated with potentially curative intent was 37 of 135 for the 2WW, 42 of 115 for the routine referrals and 10 of 90 for patients admitted as emergencies. The corresponding median survivals for the groups were 239 days (2WW), 405 days (routine) and 121 days (emergency), p < 0.001 (log rank).ConclusionsReferral by 2WW resulted in more rapid treatment than routine referral but this did not translate into an improvement in survival. This suggests that the targeting of endoscopy to patients with alarm symptoms is flawed and a less selective approach should be promoted if curable cancers are to be detected.