Evidence for a synchronous operative approach in the treatment of colorectal cancer with hepatic metastases: A case matched study

BackgroundTraditionally, a staged operative approach has been used for patients with synchronous colorectal cancer and liver metastases in the U.K. With improved outcomes from hepatic resection the role of a synchronous operative approach needs re-evaluated.Methods32 consecutive patients with colorectal cancer and hepatic metastases that underwent a synchronous operative approach were individually case matched (according to: age; sex; ASA grade; type of hepatic and colonic resection) with patients that had undergone a staged approach. The following variables were analysed: operative blood loss; in hospital morbidity and mortality; duration of hospital stay; disease free and overall survival.ResultsOperative blood losses were: synchronous group, median 475 mL (range 150–850 mL) vs median 425 mL (range 50–1700 mL), (p > 0.050). There were no significant differences in morbidity: (34% synchronous group vs 59%, p = 0.690) with no recorded mortality. Synchronous group had a shorter hospital stay (median 12 days [range 8–21] vs 20 [range 7–51], p = 0.008). There were no statistical differences between synchronous and staged patients for disease free and overall survival: 10 months (95% CI 5.8–13.7) versus 14 (95% CI 12.2–16.3; p = 0.487) and 21% versus 24% at 5 years (p = 0.838).ConclusionThis present study provides supporting evidence for synchronous operative procedures in patients with colorectal liver metastases.