کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
3991215 | 1258762 | 2011 | 9 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

IntroductionSingle-agent gemcitabine is a standard of care for elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, but novel therapies are needed for this patient population.MethodsWe performed a noncomparative randomized phase II trial of gemcitabine, erlotinib, or the combination in elderly patients (age ≥70 years) with stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer. Patients were randomized to arms: A (gemcitabine 1200 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 21 days), B (erlotinib 150 mg daily), or C (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 21 days and erlotinib 100 mg daily). Arms B and C were considered investigational; the primary objective was 6-month progression-free survival.ResultsBetween March 2006 and May 2010, 146 eligible patients received protocol therapy. The majority of the patients (82%) had stage IV disease, 64% reported adenocarcinoma histology, 90% reported current or previous tobacco use, and 28% had a performance status of 2. The 6-month progression-free survival rate observed in arms A, B, and C was 22% (95% confidence interval [CI] 11–35), 24% (95% CI 13–36), and 25% (95% CI 15–38), respectively; the median overall survival observed was 6.8 months (95% CI 4.8–8.5), 5.8 months (95% CI 3.0–8.3), and 5.6 months (95% CI 3.5–8.4), respectively. The rate of grade ≥3 hematological and nonhematological toxicity observed was similar in all three arms. The best overall health-related quality of life response did not differ between treatment arms.ConclusionsErlotinib or erlotinib and gemcitabine do not warrant further investigation in an unselected elderly patient population.
Journal: Journal of Thoracic Oncology - Volume 6, Issue 9, September 2011, Pages 1569–1577