کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
3998247 | 1259201 | 2007 | 4 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
SummaryBackgroundThe use of protective stoma in anterior resection (AR) is controversial. Neoadjuvant therapy, TME and laparoscopy seem to increase the rate of anastomotic dehiscences (a.d.).Patients and methodsIn a prospective study, 219 patients were submitted to elective open AR (109 patients), open AR+TME nerve-sparing (110 patients), 35 of which had intrasphinteric anastomosis. Fifty-five patients were treated by neoadjuvant therapy. Primary stoma was not performed.ResultsWe had 15 (6.8%) a.d.: 5 (2.3%) major and 10 (4.4%) minor. In the five major a.d. an immediate colostomy was performed with one death. In the 10 minor the a.d. was cured conservatively.ConclusionsA protective stoma is necessary in less than 10% of the patients treated with AR, so avoiding further surgery, mortality, morbidity and higher medical costs in most patients.
Journal: Surgical Oncology - Volume 16, Supplement, December 2007, Pages 105–108