کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
4069177 1604435 2009 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Palmar Abduction: Reliability of 6 Measurement Methods in Healthy Adults
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی ارتوپدی، پزشکی ورزشی و توانبخشی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Palmar Abduction: Reliability of 6 Measurement Methods in Healthy Adults
چکیده انگلیسی

PurposeThe aim of the current study was to assess reliability of 6 palmar thumb abduction measurement methods: conventional goniometry, the Inter Metacarpal Distance, the method described by the American Medical Association, the method described by the American Society of Hand Therapists, and 2 new methods: the Pollexograph-thumb and the Pollexograph-metacarpal.MethodsAn experienced hand therapist and a less-experienced examiner (trainee in plastic surgery) measured the right hands of 25 healthy subjects. Palmar abduction was measured both passively and actively. Means and ranges for palmar abduction were calculated, and intrarater and interrater reliability was expressed in intraclass correlation coefficients, standard errors of measurement, and smallest detectable differences.ResultsMean active and passive angles measured with goniometry resembled values measured with the Pollexograph-thumb method (approximately 60°). Mean angles found with the Pollexograph-metacarpal method were approximately 48°. Mean active and passive distances for the Inter Metacarpal Distance were 64 mm. Mean active and passive distances found with the American Society of Hand Therapists method were 97 to 101 mm, and mean distances found with the American Medical Association method were 67 to 70 mm for active and passive measurements. Intraclass correlation coefficients for the Pollexograph-thumb, Pollexograph-metacarpal, and the Inter Metacarpal Distance indicated good and significantly higher intrarater agreement for active and passive measurements than intraclass correlation coefficients of conventional goniometry, the American Society of Hand Therapists method, and the American Medical Association method, which showed only moderate agreement. For interrater reliability, the same measurement methods were found to be most reliable: the Pollexograph-thumb, Pollexograph-metacarpal, and the Inter Metacarpal Distance.ConclusionsWe found that the Pollexograph-thumb, Pollexograph-metacarpal, and the Inter Metacarpal Distance are the most reliable measurement methods for palmar abduction.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: The Journal of Hand Surgery - Volume 34, Issue 3, March 2009, Pages 523–530
نویسندگان
, , , , ,