کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
4079688 | 1267443 | 2012 | 4 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

The goals of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction are to restore knee stability and function and to preserve joint health. Static tests for anteroposterior laxity (eg, Lachman test or KT-1000 arthrometer) have typically shown restoration of normal or near-normal laxity with a variety of modern ACL reconstruction techniques. However, ACL reconstruction has failed to prevent the early onset of osteoarthritis, and there is growing evidence that traditional single-bundle ACL reconstruction does not restore normal knee mechanics under functional loading conditions. ACL reconstruction may fail to restore normal rotational stability during the pivot shift. Abnormal internal-external rotation and ab/adduction have been reported after ACL reconstruction during normal daily activities like walking and running. Recently, cadaveric studies have shown the potential superiority of ACL double-bundle (DB) reconstruction for restoring anatomy and mechanical function. However, clinical data demonstrating the clear superiority of DB reconstruction is lacking because of the absence of well-controlled clinical studies. Additionally, dynamic knee function after anatomic DB ACL has yet to be assessed comprehensively.
Journal: Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine - Volume 20, Issue 1, March 2012, Pages 19–22