کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
4297492 1288322 2015 9 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Model for Team Training Using the Advanced Trauma Operative Management Course: Pilot Study Analysis
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
مدل آموزش تیمی با استفاده از دوره مدیریت پیشرفته تروما: تجزیه و تحلیل مطالعات خلبان
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی عمل جراحی
چکیده انگلیسی

BackgroundEducation and training of surgeons has traditionally focused on the development of individual knowledge, technical skills, and decision making. Team training with the surgeon’s operating room staff has not been prioritized in existing educational paradigms, particularly in trauma surgery. We aimed to determine whether a pilot curriculum for surgical technicians and nurses, based on the American College of Surgeons’ Advanced Trauma Operative Management (ATOM) course, would improve staff knowledge if conducted in a team-training environment.MethodsBetween December 2012 and December 2014, 22 surgical technicians and nurses participated in a curriculum complementary to the ATOM course, consisting of 8 individual 8-hour training sessions designed by and conducted at our institution. Didactic and practical sessions included educational content, hands-on instruction, and alternating role play during 5 system-specific injury scenarios in a simulated operating room environment. A pre- and postcourse examination was administered to participants to assess for improvements in team members’ didactic knowledge.ResultsCourse participants displayed a significant improvement in didactic knowledge after working in a team setting with trauma surgeons during the ATOM course, with a 9-point improvement on the postcourse examination (83%-92%, p = 0.0008). Most participants (90.5%) completing postcourse surveys reported being “highly satisfied” with course content and quality after working in our simulated team-training setting.ConclusionsTeam training is critical to improving the knowledge base of surgical technicians and nurses in the trauma operative setting. Improved communication, efficiency, appropriate equipment use, and staff awareness are the desired outcomes when shifting the paradigm from individual to surgical team training so that improved patient outcomes, decreased risk, and cost savings can be achieved.ObjectiveDetermine whether a pilot curriculum for surgical technicians and nurses, based on the American College of Surgeons’ ATOM course, improves staff knowledge if conducted in a team-training environment.DesignSurgical technicians and nurses participated in a curriculum complementary to the ATOM course. In all, 8 individual 8-hour training sessions were conducted at our institution and contained both didactic and practical content, as well as alternating role play during 5 system-specific injury scenarios. A pre- and postcourse examination was administered to assess for improvements in didactic knowledge.SettingThe course was conducted in a simulated team-training setting at the Legacy Institute for Surgical Education and Innovation (Portland, OR), an American College of Surgeons Accredited Educational Institute.ParticipantsIn all, 22 surgical technicians and operating room nurses participated in 8 separate ATOM(s) courses and had at least 1 year of surgical scrubbing experience in general surgery with little or no exposure to Level I trauma surgical care. Of these participants, 16 completed the postcourse examination.ResultsParticipants displayed a significant improvement in didactic knowledge (83%-92%, p = 0.0008) after the ATOM(s) course. Of the 14 participants who completed postcourse surveys, 90.5% were “highly satisfied” with the course content and quality.ConclusionsTeam training is critical to improving the knowledge base of surgical technicians and nurses in the trauma operative setting and may contribute to improved patient outcomes, decreased risk, and hospital cost savings.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Surgical Education - Volume 72, Issue 6, November–December 2015, Pages 1200–1208
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , ,