کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
4410722 1307561 2011 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Comparing the sensitivity of soil invertebrates to pesticides with that of Eisenia fetida
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علوم محیط زیست شیمی زیست محیطی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Comparing the sensitivity of soil invertebrates to pesticides with that of Eisenia fetida
چکیده انگلیسی

The sole routine testing of the standard earthworm Eisenia fetida for the terrestrial risk assessment of pesticides has been under much debate since other soil invertebrates may be more sensitive than this standard test species. However, the very low availability of laboratory toxicity data for taxa other than E. fetida has greatly hampered sensitivity comparisons. In the present study, the relative tolerance (Trel) approach was used to enable comparing toxicity thresholds obtained from the US-EPA ECOTOX database, for main terrestrial taxonomic groups and pesticidal types of action (insecticides, fungicides, herbicides, and other) separately. Analyses confirmed previously reported lower and higher sensitivity of collembolans to fungicides and insecticides, respectively. However, various other discrepancies in susceptibility relative to E. fetida were encountered as indicated by species sensitivity distributions and/or calculated 95% confidence intervals of Trel values. Arachnids and isopods were found to be more sensitive to insecticides, and nematodes to fungicides, as compared to E. fetida. Implications of study findings for the terrestrial risk assessment of pesticides are discussed.


► Previously reported differences in sensitivity of collembolans and Eisenia fetida were confirmed.
► Arachnids and isopods were found to be more sensitive to insecticides than E. fetida.
► Nematodes appeared to be more sensitive to fungicides compared to E. fetida.
► The sole use of earthworms appears insufficient to protect soil communities.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Chemosphere - Volume 85, Issue 6, October 2011, Pages 1040–1047
نویسندگان
, , , ,