کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
4411167 1307581 2011 7 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
A comparative study on sorption of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) by chars, ash and carbon nanotubes
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علوم محیط زیست شیمی زیست محیطی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
A comparative study on sorption of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) by chars, ash and carbon nanotubes
چکیده انگلیسی

Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), as one of emerging contaminants, has been attracting increasing concerns in recent years. Sorption of PFOS by maize straw- and willow-derived chars (M400 and W400), maize straw-origin ash (MA) as well as three carbon nanotubes (CNTs) was studied in this work. The sorption kinetics of PFOS by the six adsorbents was well fitted by the pseudo-second-order model. CNTs reached equilibrium in 2 h, much faster than those by chars (384 h) and ash (48 h). According to the sorption isotherms, both single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNT) and MA had high sorption capacities (over 700 mg g−1), while the two chars had low sorption capacities (below 170 mg g−1) caused by their small BET surface area. In the case of MA, due to its positively charged surface, both hydrophobic interaction and electrostatic attraction involved in the sorption, and the formation of hemi-micelles further favored the sorption. This study suggested that SWCNT and MA were effective adsorbents for PFOS removal from water. Compared to SWCNT, MA is low cost and easy to obtain, so it could be a preferred adsorbent for PFOS removal.


► This study reported the sorption of PFOS on carbon nanotubes for the first time.
► Sorption kinetics and isotherms of PFOS on six carbonaceous adsorbents were compared.
► Electrostatic attraction and formation of hemi-micelles favored PFOS sorption on MA.
► MA could be a preferred adsorbent for PFOS removal from water due to its low cost.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Chemosphere - Volume 83, Issue 10, May 2011, Pages 1313–1319
نویسندگان
, , , , ,