کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
4428171 1619285 2015 10 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Evaluating methods for spatial mapping: Applications for estimating ozone concentrations across the contiguous United States
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
روش های ارزیابی نقشه برداری فضایی: برنامه های کاربردی برای برآورد غلظت های ازن در ایالات متحده مجاور
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علوم محیط زیست شیمی زیست محیطی
چکیده انگلیسی


• Evaluated method performance for predicting and mapping national ozone pollution.
• Compared land use regression, IDW, ordinary and universal kriging for prediction.
• Land use regression models revealed the presence of residual spatial variation.
• Kriging outperformed the other approaches for predicting ozone concentrations.

Understanding spatial variability of air pollutant concentrations is critical for public health assessments. Our goal is to examine ground-level ozone and comparatively evaluate method performance for predicting and mapping national concentrations across the United States, while assessing the importance of accounting for spatial variability.Cross-sectional US EPA ozone monitoring data was acquired for three days in 2006, plus environmental covariates of land use, traffic, temperature, elevation, and population. Evaluation of ozone variability was assessed with land use regression (LUR) and spatially explicit kriging models. Ozone concentration was predicted with four approaches, including LUR, inverse distance weighting (IDW), ordinary kriging, and universal kriging, and evaluated with a Monte Carlo cross-validation simulation. Results were mapped for the continental United States.Temperature, elevation, and distance to major roads were significantly related to ozone concentrations and examination of spatial dependence on LUR models revealed the presence of residual spatial variation. Cross-validation results found kriging outperformed both LUR and IDW in terms of root mean squared prediction error. We demonstrate that national-level ozone is best evaluated using the statistically optimal kriging models, which account for residual spatial variation. Universal kriging was preferred over ordinary kriging by allowing us to assess the significance of environmental covariates both for inference and prediction of ozone concentrations.

Figure optionsDownload as PowerPoint slide

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Environmental Technology & Innovation - Volume 3, April 2015, Pages 1–10
نویسندگان
, , , , ,