کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
4460345 1621324 2008 19 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Calibration and validation of hyperspectral indices for the estimation of broadleaved forest leaf chlorophyll content, leaf mass per area, leaf area index and leaf canopy biomass
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه علوم زمین و سیارات کامپیوتر در علوم زمین
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Calibration and validation of hyperspectral indices for the estimation of broadleaved forest leaf chlorophyll content, leaf mass per area, leaf area index and leaf canopy biomass
چکیده انگلیسی

This article aims at finding efficient hyperspectral indices for the estimation of forest sun leaf chlorophyll content (CHL, µg cmleaf− 2), sun leaf mass per area (LMA, gdry matter mleaf− 2), canopy leaf area index (LAI, m2leaf msoil− 2) and leaf canopy biomass (Bleaf, gdry matter msoil− 2). These parameters are useful inputs for forest ecosystem simulations at landscape scale. The method is based on the determination of the best vegetation indices (index form and wavelengths) using the radiative transfer model PROSAIL (formed by the newly-calibrated leaf reflectance model PROSPECT coupled with the multi-layer version of the canopy radiative transfer model SAIL). The results are tested on experimental measurements at both leaf and canopy scales. At the leaf scale, it is possible to estimate CHL with high precision using a two wavelength vegetation index after a simulation based calibration. At the leaf scale, the LMA is more difficult to estimate with indices. At the canopy scale, efficient indices were determined on a generic simulated database to estimate CHL, LMA, LAI and Bleaf in a general way. These indices were then applied to two Hyperion images (50 plots) on the Fontainebleau and Fougères forests and portable spectroradiometer measurements. They showed good results with an RMSE of 8.2 µg cm− 2 for CHL, 9.1 g m− 2 for LMA, 1.7 m2 m− 2 for LAI and 50.6 g m− 2 for Bleaf. However, at the canopy scale, even if the wavelengths of the calibrated indices were accurately determined with the simulated database, the regressions between the indices and the biophysical characteristics still had to be calibrated on measurements. At the canopy scale, the best indices were: for leaf chlorophyll content: NDchl = (ρ925 − ρ710)/(ρ925 + ρ710), for leaf mass per area: NDLMA = (ρ2260 − ρ1490)/(ρ2260 + ρ1490), for leaf area index: DLAI = ρ1725 − ρ970, and for canopy leaf biomass: NDBleaf = (ρ2160 − ρ1540)/(ρ2160 + ρ1540).

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Remote Sensing of Environment - Volume 112, Issue 10, 15 October 2008, Pages 3846–3864
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , ,