The effect of different extraction techniques on extraction yield, total phenolic, and anti-radical capacity of extracts from Pinus radiata Bark

The performance of four techniques, conventional maceration, Soxhlet extraction, microwave assisted extraction (MAE), and ultrasound assisted extraction (UAE), for extraction of Pinus radiata bark, in one and several stages, were evaluated. For each technique, the mass extracted (g extract/g bark), total phenols (by Folin–Cicalteau), and tannin (by precipitation) concentration and anti-radical capacity (diphenyl-picrylhydrazyl, DPPH) were quantified. In one stage, the extracted mass increased in the following order: maceration < UAE < MAE < Soxhlet (p < 0.05). The total phenols and tannin levels were also higher with the Soxhlet technique. With additional extraction stages, only the samples produced with MAE and UAE techniques improved their parameters. Additionally, MAE extracts presented a higher anti-radical capacity than does Soxhlet and Pycnogenol® extracts. Therefore, MAE was a simple and rapid method that was useful for extraction of P. radiata bark. Scanning electron micrographs (SEM) provided evidence of the mechanical effects on cell walls, mainly evidenced by cell destruction produced by Soxhlet, MAE, and UAE on the bark. In contrast, maceration only results in slightly ruptured cell pores, which could explain its low extraction yield.

Research highlights
► Classical and new techniques to extract Pinus radiata bark were evaluated.
► In one stage, extraction yield increased such as: maceration < UAE < MAE < Soxhlet. Further extraction stages only improved the parameters tested with MAE and UAE.
► The highest anti-radical capacity was observed with MAE. MAE was the simplest and rapid method for extraction of Pinus radiata bark.