Partial slip contact of a rigid pin and a linear viscoelastic plate

Viscoelastic fretting contacts differ from their elastic counterparts in notable ways. While they shakedown just like their elastic counterparts, the number of cycles to attain shakedown states is strongly dependent on the ratio of the load cycle time to the relaxation time. Steady-state cyclic bulk hysteretic energy dissipation typically dominates the cyclic Coulomb dissipation, with a more pronounced difference at slower load cycling. However, despite this, it is essential to include Coulomb friction to obtain accurate contact stresses. Moreover, while viscoelastic steady-state tractions agree very well with the elastic tractions using the steady-state shear modulus in load-hold analyses, viscoelastic fretting tractions in shakedown differ considerably from their elastic counterparts. Additionally, an approximate elastic analysis misidentifies the edge of contact by as many as 7 degrees in fretting, showing the importance of viscoelastic contact analysis. The SIE method is not restricted to simple viscoelastic networks and is tested on a 12-element solid with very long time scales. In such cases, the material is effectively always in a transient state, with no steady edge-of-contact. This has implications for fretting crack nucleation.