کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
502263 | 863696 | 2015 | 6 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
Despite the success of the combination of conservative schemes and staggered constrained transport algorithms in the last fifteen years, the accurate description of highly magnetized, relativistic flows with strong shocks represents still a challenge in numerical RMHD. The present paper focuses on the accuracy and robustness of several correction algorithms for the conserved variables, which has become a crucial ingredient in the numerical simulation of problems where the magnetic pressure dominates over the thermal pressure by more than two orders of magnitude.Two versions of non-relativistic and fully relativistic corrections have been tested and compared using a magnetized cylindrical explosion with high magnetization (≳104≳104) as test. In the non-relativistic corrections, the total energy is corrected for the difference in the classical magnetic energy term between the average of the staggered fields and the conservative ones, before (CA1) and after (CA1’) recovering the primitive variables. These corrections are unable to pass the test at any numerical resolution. The two relativistic approaches (CA2 and CA2’), correcting also the magnetic terms depending on the flow speed in both the momentum and the total energy, reveal as much more robust. These algorithms pass the test successfully and with very small deviations of the energy conservation (≲10−4≲10−4), and very low values of the total momentum (≲10−8≲10−8). In particular, the algorithm CA2’ (that corrects the conserved variables after recovering the primitive variables) passes the test at all resolutions.The numerical code used to run all the test cases is briefly described.
Journal: Computer Physics Communications - Volume 191, June 2015, Pages 100–105