Instructions to suppress semantic memory enhances or has no effect on P300 in a concealed information test (CIT)

- Two experiments investigated the effects of suppression manipulations on semantic memory.
- P300 amplitude and D-score on the aIAT were studied with P300-based complex trial protocol (ctp).
- Support for suppression was not obtained.
- Task demand effects were seen.
- We conclude that the CTP is resistant to suppression countermeasures.

The present study investigated the extent to which people can suppress semantic memory as indexed with the P300 ERP and the autobiographical implicit association test (aIAT). In EXP 1, participants (22) were run in a counterbalanced repeated measures study in both simply knowledgeable (SK) and knowledgeable with suppression (SP) conditions. A P300-based, concealed information test (“Complex Trial Protocol”; CTP) with a 50/50 Target/Nontarget (T/NT) ratio was given both with and without instructions to suppress semantic memories.The results showed increased P300s to probe name stimuli, reduced (but still high positive) aIAT d-scores, and increased simple reaction times to all stimuli used in ERP tests in the SP condition. EXP 2 was similar, but with SP and SK in two separate groups, and a 20/80 T/NT ratio. Again, ERP and aIAT results failed to show a suppression effect for semantic memory. The behavioral data suggest some task demand effects under suppression instructions, and that EXP 1 was more demanding than EXP 2.