کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
5043119 | 1475129 | 2017 | 11 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

- Glial glutamine synthetase enzyme inhibition in the LA impaired cued-fear memory.
- NREM sleep increased after cued fear-conditioning.
- Augmentation of NREM sleep, however, did not occur when memory was impaired.
- On the other hand, REM sleep decreased after cued fear-conditioning.
- The consolidation of cued fear-conditioned memory may require NREM sleep.
Many studies suggest that fear conditioning influences sleep. It is, however, not known if the changes in sleep architecture after fear conditioning are essentially associated with the consolidation of fearful memory or with fear itself. Here, we have observed that within sleep, NREM sleep consistently remained augmented after the consolidation of cued fear-conditioned memory. But a similar change did not occur after impairing memory consolidation by blocking new protein synthesis and glutamate transmission between glial-neuronal loop in the lateral amygdala (LA). Anisomycin (a protein synthesis inhibitor) and DL-α-amino-adipic acid (DL- α -AA) (a glial glutamine synthetase enzyme inhibitor) were microinjected into the LA soon after cued fear-conditioning to induce memory impairment. On the post-conditioning day, animals in both the groups exhibited significantly less freezing. In memory-consolidated groups (vehicle groups), NREM sleep significantly increased during 2nd to 5th hours after training compared to their baseline days. However, in memory impaired groups (anisomycin and DL- α -AA microinjected groups), similar changes were not observed. Our results thus suggest that changes in sleep architecture after cued fear-conditioning are indeed a consolidation dependent event.
Journal: Neurobiology of Learning and Memory - Volume 144, October 2017, Pages 155-165