Can Rosenberg's (1965) Stability of Self Scale capture within-person self-esteem variability? Meta-analytic validity and test-retest reliability

- Rosenberg's (1965) Stability of Self Scale (RSSS) had good test-retest reliability.
- The RSSS had convergent validity with temporal self-esteem stability (SD over time).
- Convergent validity was stronger when accounting for 3 sources of measurement error.
- Convergent validity was weaker when controlling for state & trait self-esteem level.
- Analyses included meta-analysis, integrated data analysis, and multilevel modeling.

Can Rosenberg's (1965) Stability of Self Scale (RSSS) capture within-person variability in state self-esteem over time? Whereas prior research found small correlations between the RSSS and temporal self-esteem instability (Kernis, Grannemann, & Barclay, 1989, 1992), we found moderate-to-large correlations. Our meta-analysis of these correlations showed convergent validity, and that studies with time-stamped state self-esteem assessments had higher correlations than those lacking them (Study 1). The RSSS also showed high test-retest reliability (Studies 2 & 3) and high convergent validity with the Labile Self-Esteem Scale (Dykman, 1998; Study 3). Exploratory analyses showed that the RSSS reflects short-term (daily, weekly) fluctuations in state self-esteem, but not long-term (annual) ones. We discuss the RSSS' efficacy as an efficient state self-esteem instability measure.