کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
5412558 | 1393434 | 2011 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Bound water: Evidence from and implications for the dielectric properties of aqueous solutions Bound water: Evidence from and implications for the dielectric properties of aqueous solutions](/preview/png/5412558.png)
Broadband dielectric spectra of a variety of aqueous solutions are evaluated as to indications of water that may be considered bound. Static permittivity decrements due to depolarizing internal electric fields, from kinetic depolarization, as well as from dielectric saturation are discussed. The latter effect reflects the preferential orientation of water permanent dipole orientations within strong Coulombic field of small ions, especially multivalent cations. Such water may be considered bound even though rapid rotations around the orientation of the electric dipole moment are definitely possible and also a fast exchange of water molecules between the hydration region and the bulk may take place. Water exhibiting large dielectric relaxation times, as typical for regions with large local concentration of foreign matter, may also be named bound. However, no clear evidence for interaction energies exceeding the hydrogen bond energy of pure water has been found. Rather enhanced relaxation times at low water content reflect the small concentration of hydrogen bonding sites and thus low probability density for the formation of a new hydrogen bond. Potential interferences of the water relaxation with relaxations from other molecules or from ionic structures are mentioned briefly.
⺠Water subject to depolarizing fields may mistakenly considered bound. ⺠Kinetic depolarization reduces static permittivity of electrolyte solutions. ⺠Dipole moments of water in strong fields of ions are prevented from reorientation. ⺠Significant relaxation time enhancement emerges at low water content.
Journal: Journal of Molecular Liquids - Volume 162, Issue 3, 15 August 2011, Pages 105-112