کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5664769 1591029 2017 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Evidence-Based Red Blood Cell Transfusion Practices in Cardiac Surgery
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
تمرینات انتقال خون سلول های سرطانی مبتنی بر شواهد در جراحی قلب
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی هماتولوژی
چکیده انگلیسی


- The decision to transfuse in cardiac surgery is complicated by several factors.
- Observational studies are invalid because of numerous systematic biases.
- Randomized controlled trials of transfusion triggers demonstrate that red cell transfusion is safe in cardiac surgical patients.
- Trials of the age of the blood demonstrate no difference in outcomes between patients transfused fresh or old red cells.
- Further trials are required that evaluate additional physiological parameters as triggers of RBC transfusion.

Cardiac surgical patients are among the highest consumers of allogeneic red blood cells (RBCs) due to the prevalence of anemia and bleeding. Up until recently, there was a paucity of high-quality evidence informing transfusion decisions in this patient group which led to wide variability in transfusion decision making. The article reviews and critically analyzes the available evidence for RBC transfusion in cardiac surgery, focusing on trials of transfusion triggers and age of blood, and provides suggestions for future research. Observational studies analyzing outcomes in patients transfused vs those not transfused have consistently shown RBC transfusion to be associated with adverse outcomes. However, multiple sources of bias in these studies invalidate their conclusions. The best available evidence comes from randomized controlled trials which compare liberal vs restrictive transfusion thresholds. To date, 6 randomized controlled trials have been reported in cardiac surgical patients, and pooled analyses have shown no differences in clinical outcomes between the 2 strategies. Similarly, research into age of RBCs and adverse outcomes has failed to demonstrate a pathological effect attributable to the storage lesion; the recent multicenter Red Cell Storage Duration Study (RECESS) trial has demonstrated no difference in outcomes between patients receiving fresh or old RBCs. Future research needs to identify what a safe transfusion threshold may be, and how this differs for different patient groups and different stages of the perioperative journey. There is also a need to evaluate other physiological parameters which, coupled with hemoglobin concentration, can better inform those patients who need an RBC transfusion.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Transfusion Medicine Reviews - Volume 31, Issue 4, October 2017, Pages 230-235
نویسندگان
, ,